In the Moscow's metro stations, my friend Francesco
noticed something that he found strange. The large electric clock
counted down the minutes passed from the departure of the most recent
train, instead of showing when the one will come. For me, the difference
was somehow unnoticeable. In many respects, Moscow, as a whole,
reminded me of early nineties Bucharest, the time when I frequently
used the very busy metro of the dirty Romanian capital city. Therefore
the unusual display of meaningless figures was somehow natural.
In
the Bucharest's underground transportation system, they have the same
habit. The time past from the last train might be useful in certain
conditions, and would require deep knowledge about how often trains
arrive at different times of the day. However, an user friendly
information would be the usual indication of how much one has to wait
until the next ride.
However,
to provide such information two condition have to be met. First is to
care for the passengers, that is to care for the customers who pay for
the transportation service, and for the wages of those who provide it.
Second is to be able to plan ahead. The later would enable simple
estimates of how much time takes a train to travel from a station to
another, depending on how many board at specific times of specific
days... The former implies a certain respect for those that buy your
service, and for yourself and the quality of your work.
Both
of these are features of cultural modernity. A certain sociological
tradition defines Eastern European postcommunist socities as
pseudomodern (see for instance Sztompka's argument on fake modernity). I
have argued 15 years ago (see the first volume from my book on
pseumodern Romania) that this comes together with Katherine Werdery's
observation that in the 80s and early 90s, Romania was a double-morale
society, where people and instituton used to affirme one thing, just to
show off, and to act in a different way, frequently promoting the
opposite. The same symbolic background to be found in the blat economy (in Alena Ledeneva's terms) supports all this, providing the legitimacy, and the perpetuation of the system.
Just
to be clear, this is not about an abstract 'System', but about what
people find normal. And in a fake modern world, planning and respecting
the others are not part of the broad picture. The clocks in the metro
stations, providing an information which lacks usefulness, are signs of
such modernity....
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu